- Buy & Build Europe
- Posts
- Traditional Search Fund vs. Self-funded Search vs. Accelerator-backed Search vs. Independent Sponsor
Traditional Search Fund vs. Self-funded Search vs. Accelerator-backed Search vs. Independent Sponsor
What are the differences? What are the respective advantages and disadvantages?

The path to Entrepreneurship Through Acquisition (ETA) can take many shapes, and understanding these variations is critical for investors and operators alike. Each fundraising and ownership structure within ETA carries its own implications on control, risk, and economic outcomes, shaping both the acquisition process and the future of the business post-close.
While traditional search funds have long been the foundational model for aspiring operators to raise capital and acquire a business, self-funded searches and independent sponsor deals have gained traction in recent years, offering alternative routes for those seeking flexibility and tailored deal structures. More recently, accelerator-backed search funds have emerged, providing structured support and community while addressing some of the challenges early searchers face.
In this article, we’ll break down the key differences between these four ETA paths, highlighting their unique structures, funding strategies, and potential outcomes so you can evaluate ETA opportunities with confidence.
Asset Class | Traditional Search Fund | Self-Funded Search | Accelerator-backed Search | Independent Sponsor |
---|---|---|---|---|
Definition | Individual or partnership raising funding to search for and acquire a business | Individual or partnership raising funding to acquire a business with a signed LOI/NBO in place | Individual or partnership joining an accelerator program that provides funding, training, and resources to search for and acquire a business | Individual or partnership raising funding to acquire a business with a signed LOI/NBO in place; usually the platform of a buy & build thesis |
Operational Involvement (Post-Closing) | Yes, CEO(s) | Yes, CEO(s) | Yes, CEO(s) | No, shareholder(s) in HoldCo |
Team Size | 1-2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 1-4 |
Salary (during Search) | €100-150k per searcher | €0 | €100-150k per searcher | €0 |
Typical Deal Size | €500k-5m+ EBITDA | €500k-2m EBITDA | €500k-5m+ EBITDA | €2-5m+ EBITDA |
Equity | €500-600k for the search period & €1-5m+ for the acquisition | €500k-5m+ for the acquisition | €1-5m+ for the acquisition (provided by the accelerator) | €2-12m+ for the acquisition (or buy & build thesis) |
Debt (% of total capital) | 30-50% | 50-90% | 30-50% | 20-50% |
Deal Multiples | 4-8x | 3-5x | 4-8x | 4-8x |
Salary (Post-Closing) | €150k+ | €150k+ | €150k+ | Management fee (5-10% EBITDA) |
Equity Share | 20-30% (vested) | 30-100% (vested) | 10-20% (vested) | 40-60% |
1. Traditional Search Fund
A Traditional Search Fund is a structured investment vehicle where one or two entrepreneurs raise capital from a group of investors to fund a dedicated search for a company to acquire, operate, and grow. Originating in the 1980s at Stanford and Harvard, this model is designed to give aspiring CEOs a pathway to ownership with mentorship and financial backing.
How it Works: The searchers raise a search capital round (typically €500-600k) from investors to cover salaries (€100-150k per searcher), travel, diligence costs, and deal-related expenses for a search period of 18-24 months. Investors receive the right to invest in the acquisition once a target is found. Upon identifying a target, a larger pool of capital (€1-5m+) is raised from the same investor group to complete the acquisition. The business typically has €500k-5m+ EBITDA, providing enough cash flow to support debt and searcher salaries post-close.
Post-Acquisition Role: Searchers step in as full-time CEOs, assuming operational control, leading day-to-day management, and executing value-creation initiatives while reporting to a supportive board.
Financing Structure:
Equity: Provided by investors for both search and acquisition
Debt: 30-50% of total capital structure, balancing risk and return
Deal multiples: 4-8x EBITDA, reflecting high-quality small cap / lower mid cap companies
Compensation:
During Search: €100-150k salary, enabling financial stability.
Post-Closing: €150k+ CEO salary
Equity Participation: 20-30% of the equity in the business, vested over time and often tied to IRR hurdles for investors
Advantages:
✅ Institutional structure with experienced investor guidance
✅ Financial stability during search
✅ Clear alignment of incentives with investors
✅ Access to high-quality businesses with supportive boards
Considerations:
⚠️ Lower ownership percentage relative to self-funded models
⚠️ Structured processes may slow flexibility in decision-making
⚠️ Need for active investor reporting and governance
Best For: Aspiring operators seeking a structured path to CEO, mentorship, and patient capital while building long-term operating and ownership experience.
2. Self-funded Search
A Self-Funded Search allows entrepreneurs to pursue acquisitions independently, retaining more equity and control while accepting greater financial and operational risk. It has gained popularity as lower barriers to deal sourcing and online networks have democratized ETA.
How it Works: Searchers use personal savings or minimal outside capital to fund their search phase, covering their living expenses, travel, and diligence costs themselves. There is no search salary, meaning the searcher bears all opportunity cost and financial risk until a deal closes. Target companies typically have €500k-2m EBITDA, smaller than traditional search targets, allowing for deals that require less equity and smaller investor groups.
Post-Acquisition Role: Searchers become full-time CEOs, actively managing and growing the business while directly benefiting from the upside created.
Financing Structure:
Equity: Provided primarily by the searcher and a small network of investors post-LOI
Debt: Higher leverage, typically 50-90% of the capital stack, often with seller financing
Deal multiples: 3-5x EBITDA, reflecting small cap / lower-mid cap transactions
Compensation:
During Search: No salary
Post-Closing: €150k+ salary once the business can support it
Equity Participation: 30-100% of the equity, depending on how much outside equity is raised
Advantages:
✅ Highest potential equity upside
✅ Full autonomy and control over deal selection and structure
✅ Flexibility to move quickly without institutional processes
Considerations:
⚠️ No income during the search phase, requiring financial runway
⚠️ Higher personal financial risk with potential to lose personal investment if no acquisition is completed
⚠️ Smaller deal sizes may limit immediate salary and professional resources post-close
Best For:
Entrepreneurs who are comfortable with risk, prefer autonomy, and want to maximize personal ownership while operating smaller but scalable businesses.
3. Accelerator-backed Search
An Accelerator-backed Search combines the structured approach of traditional search funds with additional support, mentorship, and community provided by search-focused accelerators.
How it Works: Searchers join an accelerator program, receiving structured training, mentorship, and a pre-committed investor network to fund their search and acquisition. The accelerator often funds €100-150k per searcher as a search salary, providing financial stability. Accelerator-backed searches typically target companies with €500k-5m+ EBITDA, aligning with traditional search fund target sizes while leveraging the accelerator’s deal sourcing and diligence infrastructure.
Post-Acquisition Role: Searchers step in as full-time CEOs, taking operational control while benefiting from the accelerator’s ongoing support, board participation, and shared resources.
Financing Structure:
Equity: €1-5m+ for the acquisition provided by the accelerator’s network
Debt: 30-50% of the capital stack
Deal multiples: 4-8x EBITDA
Compensation:
During Search: €100-150k search salary
Post-Closing: €150k+ CEO salary
Equity Participation: 10-20% equity, typically with vesting tied to time and performance
Advantages:
✅ Structured mentorship, training, and an instant investor network
✅ Access to experienced advisors, reducing risk for first-time searchers
✅ Faster learning curve with shared resources, frameworks, and peer support
Considerations:
⚠️ Lower equity share compared to traditional or self-funded models
⚠️ Structured reporting requirements and governance processes
⚠️ Less flexibility than fully independent searches
Best For: First-time searchers seeking structured support and mentorship with reduced risk and access to pre-committed capital, accepting lower ownership for increased confidence and resources.
4. Independent Sponsor
The Independent Sponsor model is designed for experienced operators or investors who prefer flexibility, pursuing acquisitions without a committed fund, and raising capital only after a deal is identified.
How it Works: The independent sponsor sources, diligences, and negotiates the acquisition of a target company without pre-raised committed capital. Upon securing a signed LOI, the sponsor approaches equity investors to fund the acquisition, often using their deal thesis and relationships to secure capital. Target companies typically have €2-5m+ EBITDA, and this model is often used for buy-and-build platforms or larger single acquisitions.
Post-Acquisition Role: Sponsors do not typically run the business day-to-day but serve as board members, advisors, or strategic directors while professional management runs operations.
Financing Structure:
Equity: €2-12m+ raised deal-by-deal after LOI
Debt: 20-50% of the capital stack, depending on deal specifics
Deal multiples: 4-8x EBITDA
Compensation:
During Search: No salary
Post-Closing: Compensation structured as a management fee (5-10% of EBITDA) instead of a traditional salary
Equity Participation: 40-60%, depending on the capital structure and negotiation with investors
Advantages:
✅ Flexibility to pursue specific sectors or deal theses
✅ No pressure to deploy capital quickly, allowing for selective acquisition
✅ Potential for large equity stakes and management fee income
Considerations:
⚠️ Requires strong investor network and credibility to secure funding post-LOI
⚠️ No guaranteed income during the search phase
⚠️ Less control over operations unless sponsor steps in operationally
Best For: Experienced operators, former CEOs, or investors seeking flexibility, larger deals, and meaningful equity stakes without daily operational responsibilities.