This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

❤️ Thanks to everyone who brought our newsletter to the attention of new readers last week. The “share function” can be found at the end of the email. Today’s newsletter counts 924 words and takes about 3.5 minutes to read.

In case you missed out on our last episode, please find it here.

Today’s Rundown

  • Stanford Search Fund Primer 2026

  • What Mittelstand owners actually want from you

  • How search funds work (and why returns are so high)

  • 4 deal / launch announcements

Database Overview

Get access to our two databases of +440 search funds and +380 search fund investors as a premium subscriber.

Weekly Highlights

  • Stanford released a 2026 updated version of their Search Fund Primer:

    • Search fund returns and base rates: As of 2023, search funds have delivered a historical average IRR of 35.1% and a 4.5x multiple of investment, but roughly 1 in 3 (about 40%) fail to acquire a company, and ~25% of completed acquisitions lose money for investors

    • Capital structure: Search capital is typically ~$400k–500k per searcher (covering a ~2-year search), while acquisition capital ranges from $5M–10M; search capital usually converts to acquisition equity at a 150% step-up to compensate investors for early risk

    • Searcher economics: Solo searchers typically earn up to 25% common equity, partnerships up to 30%, vested in three equal tranches (acquisition, ~4-year time-based, and performance-based — usually starting at 20% net IRR and topping out around 35% net IRR)

    • Target company criteria: Sweet spot is $10M–30M revenue with $1.5M–5M EBITDA, EBITDA margins >15%, ROTC >20%, customer concentration <30%, with realistic liquidity options in 3–6 years; the average search takes ~20 months

    • Investor preferred equity: Most common is participating preferred with a 6–8% non-redeemable coupon (Structure 1, currently preferred), versus a split structure with 15–17% redeemable / 0% non-redeemable (Structure 2); a ~5% employee equity pool is standard, and "catch-up" provisions can effectively cancel the coupon if performance hurdles are met

  • Legacy Partners published a deep dive with Evgeni Kouris on what Mittelstand owners actually want from you:

    • Market sizing: Over 500,000 German companies are expected to change hands by 2027, with roughly half (~250,000) lacking a family or internal successor — a present, not future, problem

    • Why deals fail: Mittelstand succession deals rarely collapse over valuation; they collapse because the owner can't picture the buyer as a credible custodian of what they built over 20–40 years of operating

    • What owners actually evaluate: Three underestimated factors — (1) whether you ask about people with genuine curiosity vs. treating it as a DD checkbox, (2) whether you show intellectual humility instead of claiming to understand their business better than they do in week one, and (3) whether they believe you'll still be there in 10 years (generational, not the typical ETA 5–7 year hold)

    • Higher bids regularly lose: Owners consistently walk away from higher offers when a competing buyer better demonstrates understanding of the business as a community of employees, customers, and suppliers rather than a cash-flow machine

    • The relationship path is the fast path: Trust builds through repeated low-stakes contact (events, panels, coffees, follow-ups over months) rather than cold outreach volume — the searchers winning the best businesses in the next 5 years will be those owners look forward to calling back, not those who sent the most letters

  • Carry On Podcast by AJ launched a new podcast episode on how search funds work (and why returns are so high):

    • Asset class returns: ETA Equity's portfolio (largely 2010s vintage) returned 38% IRR / 4.8x MOIC, beating but not crushing the Stanford-reported ~35% annualized average; outcomes split roughly 65% positive / 35% negative, with only a small portion going to zero — a risk profile between VC and traditional PE

    • Capital structure & investor base: Acquisitions are typically funded with 50–70% equity (less levered than 15 years ago) and 30–50% debt (senior bank, seller financing, sometimes private credit); searchers raise from 8–15 investors out of a universe of ~10–15 dedicated funds, family offices, and ~100 active individuals, with lead investors typically taking 20–30% of acquisition equity

    • Search activity benchmarks: Over a 2-year search (~730 days), the target is 1–2 signed LOIs per quarter, requiring ~100+ quality business owner conversations per LOI, ideally ~1 good owner conversation per day — making daily activity tracking essential since only one day (acquisition) is technically a "win"

    • Target profile: Sweet spot is $2–4M EBITDA businesses with high recurring revenue, high margins, low capex, low customer concentration, and critical/vital services; partnered searches outperform solo on both acquisition rates and IRR (covering >2x the ground); software has been too expensive recently, pushing investors toward blue-collar industrial services

    • Where the value is created: Most $2–4M EBITDA targets have near-zero formal outbound sales/marketing structure and only 1–2 basic service offerings, so post-acquisition value comes from basic blocking-and-tackling (sales structure, service line expansion, geographic expansion) plus operational professionalization (accrual reporting, standardized HR) that drives multiple expansion at exit to PE buyers

Deal / Launch Announcements

  • 🇩🇪 Gen2 Capital Partners, a self-funded search fund led by Johannes Viehhauser and Maximilian Krause, acquired ROOS Feinmechanik, a medtech CNC manufacturer (link)

  • 🇪🇸 Targos Capital, a search fund led by Diego Canales Delgado, acquired Cartondis, Letro and Trelaco, a corrugated cardboard packaging group (link)

  • 🇬🇧 Barnaby Lewis launched Peak Partner Capital, a search fund focused on B2B Service-led businesses (link)

  • 🇮🇹 William Hillgarth launched Etrus Capital, a sector-agnostic search fund (link)

Any suggestions, questions, or criticism? Any topics that should be covered in the future? By answering this email, you’re sliding right into my inbox.

Keep Reading